Skip to main content
Allegheny County Header
File #: 13788-26    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Motion Status: To Be Introduced
File created: 12/26/2025 In control: Chief Clerk
On agenda: Final action:
Title: Motion of the Council of Allegheny County directing Council's solicitor to evaluate the merits of filing an amicus curiae brief in the matter of Allegheny County Prison Employees Independent Union v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board.
Sponsors: Bethany Hallam
Attachments: 1. 13788-26 Allowance of Appeal Copy.pdf, 2. 13788-26 Pa.Cmwlth. Opinion Copy.pdf
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.
title
Motion of the Council of Allegheny County directing Council's solicitor to evaluate the merits of filing an amicus curiae brief in the matter of Allegheny County Prison Employees Independent Union v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board.

body
WHEREAS, on May 18, 2021 the voters of Allegheny County adopted a number of restrictions upon the use of force - specifically solitary confinement, a device known as the “restraint chair,” pepper spray, and leg shackles - within the Allegheny County Jail via ordinance enacted through the County’s Charter-guaranteed ballot initiative referendum process; and

WHEREAS, the Allegheny County Prison Employees Independent Union (“the union”) initially filed a Charge of Unfair Practices with the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board (“PLRB”) on July 2, 2021, in which the union argued that the referendum-enacted ordinance established changes to the terms and conditions of employment in the County Jail that must instead be subject to collective bargaining under the terms of the Commonwealth’s Public Employee Relations Act (PERA), specifically 43 P.S. §1101.1201(a)(1) and (a)(5); and

WHEREAS, on November 2, 2022, the PLRB’s Hearing Examiner circulated a Proposed Decision and Order dismissing the union’s Charge, and finding that the referendum-enacted changes were inherently managerial in nature, and therefore not subject to collective bargaining under the terms of PERA; and

WHEREAS, the union filed exceptions to the Proposed Decision and Order, which were also dismissed by the PLRB in its final order on September 19, 2023, in which the hearing officer’s findings were formally adopted; and

WHEREAS, the union then appealed the PLRB’s final order to the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court; and

WHEREAS, on May 30, 2025, the Commonwealth Court affirmed the PLRB’s final order (the Court’s opinion is attached to this motion); and

WHEREAS, the union then appealed the Commonwealth Court’s decision to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, w...

Click here for full text