Allegheny County Header
File #: 8153-14    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Resolution Status: In Committee
File created: 3/14/2014 In control: Committee on Government Reform
On agenda: 3/18/2014 Final action:
Title: A resolution of the County of Allegheny, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, urging the General Assembly and Governor to enact Senate Bill 372, an Act amending Title 42 (Judiciary and Judicial Procedure) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, further providing for form of permanent recordation and for copies of destroyed records, laid on the table by the Senate on April 10, 2013, with all deliberate speed.
Sponsors: Michael Finnerty, Nick Futules, Bob Macey, Chuck Martoni, Sue Means, John Palmiere, Jan Rea
A resolution of the County of Allegheny, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, urging the General Assembly and Governor to enact Senate Bill 372, an Act amending Title 42 (Judiciary and Judicial Procedure) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, further providing for form of permanent recordation and for copies of destroyed records, laid on the table by the Senate on April 10, 2013, with all deliberate speed.


Whereas, pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S.A. §§4323 and 4324, Allegheny and other Counties within the Commonwealth must retain paper records of judicial proceedings unless they are first converted to other analog formats (e.g. microfiche, microfilm, video tape or magnetic tape) for retention purposes; and

Whereas, the conversion of paper records to the analog formats required by §§4323 and 4324 is a comparatively labor intensive process, requiring the use of aging technology that is increasingly expensive to maintain; and

Whereas, while documents reduced to some of the authorized analog formats require less storage space than paper documents, they also require significantly more storage space than digitally stored documents; and

Whereas, Allegheny County currently maintains document storage space in multiple locations: the County Courthouse, a warehouse within the City of Pittsburgh, a dedicated storage facility in Clarion County, and at space arranged through a private document storage company; and

Whereas, the County’s current document storage arrangements require more space than would be required for digitally stored documents, and if the retention of digital documents were to be permitted, some portion of this storage space could be dedicated to other purposes or rendered unnecessary; and

Whereas, while the storage space currently occupied by the County’s court records may not be reduced immediately due to the time necessary to convert existing analog records to digital records, the conversion would allow the Department of Court Records to avoid the need for rentin...

Click here for full text