Allegheny County Header
File #: 9016-15    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Motion Status: Passed
File created: 6/12/2015 In control: Chief Clerk
On agenda: 6/16/2015 Final action: 6/16/2015
Title: Motion expressing the Sense of the Council of Allegheny County strongly urging the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) not to pursue an appeal of the recent ruling of Commonwealth Court President Judge Pellegrini due to the potential deleterious effects that such an appeal could inflict upon more than 182,000 senior citizens who reside in and around Allegheny County.
Sponsors: Ed Kress, John DeFazio
Attachments: 1. 9016-15, Motion.pdf
MOTION OF THE COUNCIL OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Expressing the Sense of the Council of Allegheny County strongly urging the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) not to pursue an appeal of the recent ruling of Commonwealth Court President Judge Pellegrini due to the potential deleterious effects that such an appeal could inflict upon more than 182,000 senior citizens who reside in and around Allegheny County.
WHEREAS, both Highmark Inc. and UPMC submitted separate Consent Decrees which were approved by the Commonwealth Court on July 1, 2014 in settling a Petition for Review that Commonwealth of Pennsylvania had filed; and
WHEREAS, as part of these Consent Decrees, it was mutually agreed that UPMC shall continue to contract with Highmark at In-Network rates for all of the vulnerable populations that included Highmark consumers age 65 or older who are eligible or are covered under Medicare Advantage; and
WHEREAS, on March 20, 2015 UPMC notified Highmark that UPMC will terminate all of its Highmark Medicare Advantage hospital and physician contracts with Highmark effectively depriving 182,000 seniors who have Highmark Medicare from its hospitals starting next year in direct contravention of the Consent Decrees; and
WHEREAS, this decision by UPMC to terminate all of its Highmark Medicare Advantage hospital and physician contracts was based upon a contract dispute over reimbursements for oncology treatment; and
WHEREAS, the decision by UPMC to terminate services to Medicare Advantage customers prompted Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane, with backing from Gov. Tom Wolf and the state insurance department, to file a motion to try to force the two health care giants into binding arbitration; and
WHEREAS, UPMC was prevented from undertaking this action by the May 27, 2015 ruling of Commonwealth Court President Judge Daniel Pellegrini (attached to this motion), who ordered the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center's health system to maintain in-network rate...

Click here for full text