Allegheny County Header
File #: 9068-15    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Motion Status: In Committee
File created: 7/6/2015 In control: Committee on Government Reform
On agenda: 7/7/2015 Final action:
Title: Motion expressing the Sense of the Council of Allegheny County urging the Chief Executive to conduct a review on the residency status of all current County employees not subject to a residency requirement exception.
Sponsors: Sue Means
MOTION OF THE COUNCIL OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Expressing the Sense of the Council of Allegheny County urging the Chief Executive to conduct a review on the residency status of all current County employees not subject to a residency requirement exception.
WHEREAS, Administrative Code, § 5-1007.11 entitled Residency , states that an applicant for County employment need not be a resident of the County at the time of application, however, within one year of appointment and acceptance of such appointment, such individual shall be required to move to and live within Allegheny County; and
WHEREAS, as required by the Administrative Code, § 5-1009.03, prior to the beginning of employment with the County, all prospective employees are given a handbook containing information including the residency requirement and asked to acknowledge receipt of this information, assuring that all employees have been given notice of the residency requirement prior to accepting employment with the County; and
WHEREAS, exceptions to the County residency requirement currently include 911 Center employees, licensed practical and registered nurses at the John J. Kane Regional Centers, County Jail medical staff and more limited exceptions for positions such as lifeguards, caseworkers, air pollution control engineers and information technology employees; and
WHEREAS, County Council has recently approved an expansion of the residency requirement exceptions in response to concerns the administration has expressed regarding the need to staff medical positions at the Allegheny County Jail due to the cessation of the contract with Corizon; and
WHEREAS, as a result of discussions regarding the expansion of the residency requirement it was brought to the attention of Council that there may be employees of the County who are currently in violation of the Code; and
WHEREAS, it has been stated by the administration that around 4,500 employees are subject to the resid...

Click here for full text